Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639421›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

A new tool to quantify biodiversity change under landscape transformation.

Renato Richard Hilário, William Douglas Carvalho, Bruna Da Silva Xavier, Jorge M Palmeirim, Marcus Vinícius Vieira, Karen Mustin, Pedro Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A new tool to quantify biodiversity change under landscape transformation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renato Richard HilárioDepartment of Environment and Development, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-0921
William Douglas CarvalhoPost-Graduate Program in Tropical Biodiversity, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2518-9148
Bruna Da Silva XavierPost-Graduate Program in Ecology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jorge M PalmeirimCenter for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change CE3C and CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marcus Vinícius VieiraPost-Graduate Program in Ecology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4472-5447
Karen MustinPost-Graduate Program in Tropical Biodiversity, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.
Pedro CardosoCenter for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change CE3C and CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Bat Conservation International 2434131Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308.974/2015-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 441.589/2016-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), BrazilFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-203.045/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LA/P/0121/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/00329/2020National Geographic Society EC-59186R-19National Geographic Society NGS-83254R-20Neotropical Grassland Conservancy 01098803-5Rufford Foundation 25585-1Spanish Ministry of Universities CA3/RSUE/2021-00197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying how species richness or diversity changes with different proportions of natural and anthropized environments in the landscape is important for landscape management for conservation. Here, we propose a new method to assess biodiversity changes in landscapes with varying proportions of habitat types. The algorithm is based on the resampling of individuals recorded in different habitats considering both the proportion occupied by each habitat in the landscape and the number of individuals recorded in each habitat. The diversity is assessed based on the sampled individuals. If a functional/phylogenetic tree or distance matrix is provided, the function returns the functional or phylogenetic richness values. This procedure is replicated a number of times with different proportions of each of the habitats in the landscape. Our method copes with two or more habitat types in the landscape and works with taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities. We tested our method using 10 different simulated scenarios and one empirical dataset with bats (Chiroptera) to assess whether they behaved as expected. Our method performed as expected in all scenarios and in the empirical dataset (considering also the functional and phylogenetic diversities in this latter case). The possibility of working with more than two habitat types and with different dimensions of diversity (i.e., functional and phylogenetic diversity) is a major advantage of the new method. We show that this is a valuable tool to assess biodiversity changes in the context of landscape planning, helping to promote more sustainable landscapes often composed of multiple habitat types with mixed biodiversity composition.

Indexed as

BiodiversityChiropteraConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAlgorithmsAnimalsModels, BiologicalPhylogenyfunctional diversityHill numbersland use changesphylogenetic diversityspecies diversitytaxonomic diversity

Identifiers

PMID39639421
PMCPMC11725996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.