Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639410›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2024

Dry needling as an adjunct treatment to multimodal rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair surgery: a preliminary, randomized sham-controlled trial.

Faeze Naseri, Mehdi Dadgoo, Mohammadreza Pourahmadi, Morteza Nakhaei Amroodi, Shirin Azizi, Amirhossein Shamsi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faeze NaseriIranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi DadgooIranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mehdidadgoo@gmail.com.
Mohammadreza PourahmadiIranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza Nakhaei AmroodiBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin AziziIranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein ShamsiDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotator cuff repair (RCR) is one of the most prevalent procedures to manage rotator cuff tears (RCT). Postoperative shoulder pain is a common complication following RCR and may be aggravated by activation of myofascial trigger points (MTrP) associated with the injury to the soft tissues surrounding the surgical incision. This study aimed to describe a preliminary, randomized, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing 4 sessions of myofascial trigger point dry needling (MTrP-DN) as a muscle treatment approach along with 10 sessions of multimodal rehabilitation protocol (MRh) consisting of therapeutic exercise, manual therapy, and electrotherapy on postoperative shoulder pain, range of motion (ROM), strength, and functional outcome scores for patients following RCR surgery.

methodsForty-six patients aged 40-75 following RCR surgery were recruited and randomly allocated into 2 groups: (1) MTrP-DN plus MRh (experimental group), and (2) sham dry needling (S-DN) plus MRh (control group). This trial had a 4-week intervention period. The primary outcome was the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for postoperative shoulder pain. Secondary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), ROM, and strength. The mentioned outcomes were measured at baseline and week 4. In the current study, adverse events were recorded as well.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between groups when adding MTrP-DN to MRh for postoperative shoulder pain after 4 weeks of intervention (mean difference 0.32, [95% CI -0.41,1.05], p = 0.37). However, this trial found a small effect size for postoperative shoulder pain. No significant between-group differences were detected in any of the secondary outcomes (p > 0.05) either. We found significant within-group changes in all studied outcome measures. (p < 0.001). This study also reported minor adverse events. following the needling approach.

conclusionThe lack of statistically significant differences in the outcomes and small clinical significance in shoulder pain highlights the complexity of pain management, suggesting that alternative methodologies may be needed for meaningful clinical benefits. Future studies should consider different control groups, long-term follow ups, larger sample sizes, and more MTrP-DN sessions to better understand their potential impact.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at ( https://www.irct.ir ), (IRCT20211005052677N1) on 19/02/2022.

Indexed as

Dry NeedlingPostoperative PainRange of Motion, ArticularRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder PainAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeDry needlingPostoperative shoulder PainRotator Cuff repairRotator cuff tearShoulder rehabilitationTrigger point

Identifiers

PMID39639410
PMCPMC11622656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.