ArticleBMC rheumatology2024
Discussing male sexual and reproductive health in the rheumatology outpatient clinic: a Q-methodology study.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motivations of patients with dentofacial deformities seeking orthognathic treatment: an application of Q methodology.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Reproductive Health in Rheumatology: Making 'Early and Regular' Work in Practice.EULAR rheumatology open · 2025Review
- Family Planning and Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInflammatory arthritis (IA) has been associated with various problems related to male sexual and reproductive health (SRH). However, addressing these issues in the clinic remains a challenge. In this study, we aimed to describe the viewpoints of rheumatologists and male patients with IA regarding the aspects that influence their communication about SRH.
methodsRheumatologists and adult men with IA were invited to participate. This study uses Q-methodology, a mixed methods approach to systematically study subjectivity. Participants ranked 32 aspects according to their degree of influence (least-most influence) in addressing SRH and were then interviewed. Factor analysis was used to identify common patterns in the rankings. These patterns were interpreted as the different viewpoints of rheumatologists and male patients, supported by the qualitative data from the interviews. To obtain more generalizable results, the study was conducted in two countries with different socio-cultural backgrounds and healthcare systems, The Netherlands and Mexico.
results30 rheumatologists and 30 men with IA were included in each country. The analysis revealed three viewpoints in each group. Rheumatologists are more likely to be influenced by aspects such as the patient's desire to become a father or the patients' (young) age, but patients by a much more diverse pool of aspects, such as potential side effects of medication on their sexual function.
conclusionsThis study identified different viewpoints on the aspects that influence discussing SRH between rheumatologists and male patients, and important differences in viewpoints between both groups. Further research is needed to reach consensus on how and when rheumatologists and male patients should discuss SRH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.