ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Practical Guide for Cardiologists.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Strategies, Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death, and Contemporary Management-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of T2 mapping in cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Position Statement on Multimodal Cardiac Imaging in Patients with Systemic Diseases - 2026.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Diagnostic challenges in isolated cardiac sarcoidosis.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Clinical and imaging profiling of restrictive cardiomyopathies: insights into amyloid, sarcoid, and iron overload phenotypes.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Implications of the 2024 American Heart Association Classification of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Characteristics and Outcome of Patients Across the Continuum of Diagnostic Likelihood.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology and Diagnostic-Therapeutic Processes.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Value of Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment Including Speckle-Tracking in Patients with Sarcoidosis Versus Healthy Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Case Report: The Utility of Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Has It Surpassed the Need for a Biopsy?Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis Reactivation in a Transplanted Heart: An Unusual Case of New Graft Dysfunction.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available. METHODS AND
resultsThe data of 260 consecutive patients with CS (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone EMB, 47 with repeat procedures. EMB overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive EMB was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-12.0, p = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1, p = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4, p = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid-apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.8, p = 0.024). EMB sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (n = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (n = 76), 2 (n = 62), 3 (n = 33), and 4/4 (n = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive EMB was not an independent predictor of prognosis.
conclusionThe sensitivity of EMB in CS depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe CS is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre-test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.