Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639404›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Henriikka Mälkönen, Jukka Lehtonen, Pauli Pöyhönen, Valtteri Uusitalo, Mikko I Mäyränpää, Markku Kupari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic and prognostic value of T2 mapping in cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henriikka MälkönenHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7698-0896
Jukka LehtonenHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pauli PöyhönenHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Valtteri UusitaloClinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko I MäyränpääDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki, and Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Markku KupariHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available. METHODS AND

resultsThe data of 260 consecutive patients with CS (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone EMB, 47 with repeat procedures. EMB overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive EMB was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-12.0, p = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1, p = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4, p = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid-apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.8, p = 0.024). EMB sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (n = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (n = 76), 2 (n = 62), 3 (n = 33), and 4/4 (n = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive EMB was not an independent predictor of prognosis.

conclusionThe sensitivity of EMB in CS depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe CS is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre-test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesMyocardiumSarcoidosisAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCardiac sarcoidosisDiagnosisEndomyocardial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39639404
PMCPMC11955311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.