ArticleCell & bioscience2024
Identification of potential drug targets for diabetic polyneuropathy through Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Cell & bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is a common diabetes complication with limited treatment options. We aimed to identify circulating plasma proteins as potential therapeutic targets for DPN using Mendelian Randomization (MR).
methodsThe protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) utilized in this study were derived from seven previously published genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on plasma proteomics. The DPN data were obtained from the IEU OpenGWAS project. This study employed two-sample MR using MR-Egger and inverse-variance weighted methods to evaluate the causal relationship between plasma proteins and DPN risk, with Cochran's Q test, and I
resultsUsing cis-pQTLs as genetic instruments, we identified 62 proteins associated with DPN, with 33 increasing the risk and 29 decreasing the risk of DPN. Using cis-pQTLs + trans-pQTLs, we identified 116 proteins associated with DPN, with 44 increasing the risk and 72 decreasing the risk of DPN. Steiger directionality tests indicated that the causal relationships between circulating plasma proteins and DPN were consistent with expected directions.
conclusionThis study identified 96 circulating plasma proteins with genetically determined levels that affect the risk of DPN, providing new potential targets for DPN drug development, particularly ITM2B, CREG1, CD14, and PLXNA4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.