Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639345›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the quiet quitting scale in healthcare workers.

Ahmet Yıldız, Erhan Ekingen, İbrahim Gün, Murat Yıldırım

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmet YıldızFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management, Batman University, Batman, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-0225
Erhan EkingenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management, Batman University, Batman, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-7299
İbrahim GünFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management, Batman University, Batman, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-9097
Murat YıldırımDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Fırat Mahallesi Yeni Üniversite Caddesi No: 2 AE/1 Merkez, Ağrı - Türkiye, 04100, Turkey. muratyildirim@agri.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1089-1380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS) among healthcare workers. After completing the language validation, the psychometric properties of the QQS were tested on a sample of 542 healthcare workers from two hospitals in Turkey. Convergent validity was examined using the Burnout Measure-Short Version (BMS). The reliability of the scale was evaluated through internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability. Factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensional structure of the QQS with its seven items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.81, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.91, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient for split-half reliability was 0.80. Additionally, the test-retest reliability was found to be high. A correlation coefficient of 0.79 between the QQS and BMS confirmed the scale's convergent validity. These results suggest that the Turkish version of the QQS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring quiet quitting behavior in healthcare workers. Further research with different sample groups is recommended.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPsychometricsAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultHealthcare workersNursingQuiet quitting scaleReliabilityTurkish versionValidity

Identifiers

PMID39639345
PMCPMC11622596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.