Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639329›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2024

Artificial intelligence applied to the study of human milk and breastfeeding: a scoping review.

Sergio Agudelo-Pérez, Daniel Botero-Rosas, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarado, Julián Espitia-Angel, Lina Raigoso-Díaz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio Agudelo-PérezDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia. sergioagpe@unisabana.edu.co.
Daniel Botero-RosasDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Laura Rodríguez-AlvaradoDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Julián Espitia-AngelDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
Lina Raigoso-DíazDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.

Funding

Universidad de La Sabana MED-6-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding rates remain below the globally recommended levels, a situation associated with higher infant and neonatal mortality rates. The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) could help improve and increase breastfeeding rates. This study aimed to identify and synthesize the current information on the use of AI in the analysis of human milk and breastfeeding.

methodsA scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The literature search, performed in December 2023, used predetermined keywords from the PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and WoS databases. Observational and qualitative studies evaluating AI in the analysis of breastfeeding patterns and human milk composition have been conducted. A thematic analysis was employed to categorize and synthesize the data.

resultsNineteen studies were included. The primary AI approaches were machine learning, neural networks, and chatbot development. The thematic analysis revealed five major categories: 1. Prediction of exclusive breastfeeding patterns: AI models, such as decision trees and machine learning algorithms, identify factors influencing breastfeeding practices, including maternal experience, hospital policies, and social determinants, highlighting actionable predictors for intervention. 2. Analysis of macronutrients in human milk: AI predicted fat, protein, and nutrient content with high accuracy, improving the operational efficiency of milk banks and nutritional assessments. 3. Education and support for breastfeeding mothers: AI-driven chatbots address breastfeeding concerns, debunked myths, and connect mothers to milk donation programs, demonstrating high engagement and satisfaction rates. 4. Detection and transmission of drugs in breast milk: AI techniques, including neural networks and predictive models, identified drug transfer rates and assessed pharmacological risks during lactation. 5. Identification of environmental contaminants in milk: AI models predict exposure to contaminants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls, based on maternal and environmental factors, aiding in risk assessment.

conclusionAI-based models have shown the potential to increase breastfeeding rates by identifying high-risk populations and providing tailored support. Additionally, AI has enabled a more precise analysis of human milk composition, drug transfer, and contaminant detection, offering significant insights into lactation science and maternal-infant health. These findings suggest that AI can promote breastfeeding, improve milk safety, and enhance infant nutrition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast FeedingMilk, HumanFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceBreast FeedingHuman MilkMachine LearningNeural Network

Identifiers

PMID39639329
PMCPMC11622664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.