Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639318›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2024

Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals.

Morgane Plançon, Ashley Ridley, Kristopher Lamore, Andréa Tarot, Alexis Burnod, François Blot, Isabelle Colombet

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morgane PlançonPalliative Care Mobile Unit, General Hospital, Valenciennes, France. plancon-m@ch-valenciennes.fr.
Ashley RidleyDepartement of Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France.
Kristopher LamoreUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, F 59000, France.
Andréa TarotPalliative Care Unit, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Alexis BurnodCurie Institute, Paris, France.
François BlotIntensive Care Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle ColombetDepartement Recherche, Enseignement, Formation, Maison médicale Jeanne Garnier FR, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly palliative care interventions in oncology, as recommended by international oncology societies, promote patient understanding and support decision-making. At the same time, shared decision-making models are being developed to enhance patient participation as part of a new model of patient-physician relationship. For patients with palliative needs, this participation is essential and helps to avoid futile and aggressive treatments at the end of life. The aim of this study is to observe decision making during meetings between oncology and palliative care professionals, focusing particularly on the components of shared decision-making models, but also on the role played by palliative care professionals.

methodsWe conducted a non-participant observation of multidisciplinary meetings and outpatient clinic activities in two Comprehensive Cancer Centres in France. Field notes were then coded using thematic content analysis. Deductive analysis was conducted using the observation grid developed from Elwyn's three-talk model.

resultsOnly a few elements of the different models of shared decision-making are apparent in the multidisciplinary meetings. Palliative care professionals emphasise the importance of involving patients and providing them with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. However, patient involvement in decision-making remains difficult in daily practice. Decisions to discontinue oncological treatment are often driven by clinical and biological signs of terminal evolution rather than shared decision-making.

conclusionsThere are still cultural and organisational barriers to actual implementation of early integrated onco-palliative care. Promotion of shared decision making can be a strong lever of change which is frequently mobilised by palliative care teams.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPalliative CareCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleFranceHumansMaleMedical OncologyOncologistsPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchAdvance care planningCancerEthicsPalliative careShared making decision

Identifiers

PMID39639318
PMCPMC11622459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.