ArticleBMC health services research2024
Prescribing patterns before the initiation of novel antidiabetic medicines in public, occupational, and private healthcare: a register study reflecting the guidelines of care in type 2 diabetes.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisparities in access to healthcare has been implied before in Finland, a country with universal healthcare but de facto tiered primary care. Less is however known about the content of care provided in different settings. Previous studies indicate potential disparities in prescribing newer medicines between healthcare sectors. We compared the preceding prescribing patterns of patients who initiated a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor or a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue in public, occupational, and private healthcare.
methodsWe used logistic models and patient-level register data from the city of Oulu, Finland, during 2014-2018. Among patients who initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 analogues, we studied whether it was a first-line treatment or if other antidiabetic medicines preceded the use. In addition, prior use of statins (a lipid-lowering medicine) and insulins were studied. Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes recommend in most cases metformin in first-line, and insulin only at later stages or in case of severe hyperglycaemia. Using a lipid-lowering medicine is typically recommended for all.
resultsThe examined novel antidiabetic medicines were seldom initiated in first-line, and no significant differences were observed for preceding statin use across sectors, net of patient characteristics. However, patients in the public sector were more likely to have used insulin previously compared to patients in occupational sector.
conclusionsBefore the initiation of the examined novel antidiabetic medicines, no marked differences across sectors in the use of other antidiabetic medicines or statins were observed. The higher likelihood of prior insulin use in the public sector might reflect initiation at a later stage and/or unobserved differences in clinical characteristics across patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.