Observational studyReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024
Is oral dydrogesterone equivalent to vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal phase support in women receiving oocyte donation?
Observational study in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Daily 50 mg Intramuscular Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: Analysis of Serum Levels and Pregnancy Outcomes.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
research questionTo determine whether the use of oral dydrogesterone (DYD) in luteal phase support (LPS) during an artificial cycle provides equivalent clinical and ongoing pregnancy, delivery and miscarriage rates as micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) in oocyte donation recipients.
designThis was a retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data from the assisted reproductive technology (ART) Department of Lille University Hospital from July 2018 to July 2022. All recipients underwent endometrial preparation by an artificial cycle. Luteal phase support (LPS) was provided by weekly intramuscular progesterone (IM) (500 mg/2 ml) and either DYD (40 mg/day) or MVP (800 mg/day) for 12 weeks if the pregnancy test was positive. The primary endpoint was the clinical pregnancy rate.
resultsOur study analysed 372 oocyte donation cycles with embryo transfer: 162 embryo transfers with DYD + IM progesterone and 210 embryo transfers with MVP + IM progesterone. After adjustment for confounding factors, our two groups were comparable in terms of clinical pregnancy rates, with 36.7% in the MVP group versus 30.3% in the DYD group (p = 0.55); ongoing pregnancy rates (29,1% versus 25.3%, p = 0.95); miscarriage rates (7.6% versus 4.9%, p = 0.35); and live birth rates (26.7% versus 25.3%, p = 0.86).
conclusionOral dydrogesterone seems to be a good alternative to vaginal micronized progesterone for LPS treatment during an artificial cycle, especially in combination with a weekly injection of intramuscular progesterone in the course of oocyte donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.