Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639153›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2025

Edridge Green Lecture 2022-demystifying clinical trials and regulatory approvals in drug development.

Victor Chong

Abstract readLecture
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Victor ChongUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK. victor@eretina.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7693-522X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of clinical trial design and regulatory pathways essential for drug development, specifically in the context of retinal diseases. Key concepts include trial structure, efficacy and safety endpoints, and regulatory expectations from agencies like the FDA. It delves into recent regulatory advancements, such as the inclusion of low-luminance vision as a secondary endpoint and analyses case studies from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) trials. Approvals for key retinal drugs, such as ranibizumab and aflibercept, treatments for AMD and diabetic macular oedema, are discussed highlighting criteria like the 15-letter gain/loss in visual acuity as approvable/clinical meaningful efficacy endpoints. Insights into geographic atrophy (GA) and diabetic retinopathy trials showcase the evolving landscape, where anatomical endpoints and new drugs bring fresh challenges and opportunities. It also emphasizes the importance of academic-industry collaboration, citing instances of gene therapy development and innovative endpoint measures like the Multi-Luminance Mobility Test for retinal dystrophies. The overarching aim of this lecture was to demystify the process that spans the design of clinical trials to regulatory approval of drugs so that clinicians understand these complexities. In particular, it is important to understand the reasons behind selection of trial design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary and secondary efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints. Since this lecture, there have been important changes in this field including new guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as lessons learnt from recent drug approvals that are included in this manuscript.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansMacular DegenerationRetinal DiseasesUnited StatesAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39639153
PMCPMC11794597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.