Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639103›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Robust modelling of arterial blood pressure reconstruction from photoplethysmography.

Jiating Pan, Lishi Liang, Yongbo Liang, Qunfeng Tang, Zhencheng Chen, Jianming Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Arterial blood pressure waveform reconstruction estimation from PPG using TCN-BiLSTM.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiating PanSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Lishi LiangSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Yongbo LiangSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Qunfeng TangSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Zhencheng ChenSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China. zhenchengchen18@163.com.
Jianming ZhuSchool of life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China. zjmcsu@126.com.

Funding

Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Base Construction Guike ZY24212046Guangxi Innovation Driven Development Project Guike AA19254003Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detecting Technology and Instruments YQ23108Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China 2022GXNSFAA035507National Natural Science Foundation of China 62263008National Natural Science Foundation of China Joint Fund Project U22A2092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure is a crucial indicator of cardiovascular disease, and arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveforms contain information that reflects the cardiovascular status. We propose a novel deep-learning method that converts photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals into ABP waveforms. We used [Formula: see text]-Net as a feature extractor and designed a Bi-block to capture individualised time information in encoder feature extraction. We further enhanced the prediction accuracy of the ABP waveforms by applying a combined loss function to each layer of deep supervision. We also propose a total error index (TEI) to measure overall performance. Furthermore, we extended our method from the UCI dataset to the VitalDB dataset, achieving mean absolute error ± standard deviation (MAE ± STD) values of 2.48 ± 1.95, 1.42 ± 1.42, and 1.48 ± 1.36 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in UCI dataset, and 2.16 ± 1.53, 1.12 ± 0.59, and 1.35 ± 0.84 mmHg in VitalDB dataset, respectively. The mean ± STD values of the TEI index are 0.29 ± 0.10 in UCI dataset and 0.29 ± 0.15 in VitalDB dataset. These results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over existing methods and its robustness to different sampling frequencies and devices.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureDeep LearningPhotoplethysmographyAdultAgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedABP waveformNon-invasivePPGRobust

Identifiers

PMID39639103
PMCPMC11621803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.