ArticleScientific reports2024
Robust modelling of arterial blood pressure reconstruction from photoplethysmography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arterial blood pressure waveform reconstruction estimation from PPG using TCN-BiLSTM.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- From PPG to Blood Pressure at the Edge: Quantization-Aware Architecture Selection and On-MCU Validation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure is a crucial indicator of cardiovascular disease, and arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveforms contain information that reflects the cardiovascular status. We propose a novel deep-learning method that converts photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals into ABP waveforms. We used [Formula: see text]-Net as a feature extractor and designed a Bi-block to capture individualised time information in encoder feature extraction. We further enhanced the prediction accuracy of the ABP waveforms by applying a combined loss function to each layer of deep supervision. We also propose a total error index (TEI) to measure overall performance. Furthermore, we extended our method from the UCI dataset to the VitalDB dataset, achieving mean absolute error ± standard deviation (MAE ± STD) values of 2.48 ± 1.95, 1.42 ± 1.42, and 1.48 ± 1.36 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in UCI dataset, and 2.16 ± 1.53, 1.12 ± 0.59, and 1.35 ± 0.84 mmHg in VitalDB dataset, respectively. The mean ± STD values of the TEI index are 0.29 ± 0.10 in UCI dataset and 0.29 ± 0.15 in VitalDB dataset. These results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over existing methods and its robustness to different sampling frequencies and devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.