Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Stimulus conditions that promote habitual control.

Zachary J Pierce-Messick, Laura H Corbit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary J Pierce-MessickDepartment of Psychology, The University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Laura H CorbitDepartment of Psychology, The University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada. laura.corbit@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR 508660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two experiments in rats examined how training where a stimulus signaled when to respond for reward, conditions that should favour S-R learning, might lead to habitual control of behaviour. Experiment 1 investigated how animals trained with a stimulus preceding lever insertion would impact learning relative to a group that was self-paced and could control lever insertion with a second, distinct response. Rats were then tested for sensitivity to outcome devaluation to distinguish between goal-directed and habitual control. We found that free-operant, self-paced conditions promoted goal-directed control while signaling trials with a stimulus promoted habitual control evidenced as insensitivity to outcome devaluation. Experiment 2 assessed whether the stimulus-outcome association is important for driving habitual responding when training occurs with a traditional discriminative stimulus. A comparison group was trained under free-operant conditions and experienced the same stimulus presented alongside the earned reward. Following devaluation, animals trained under discriminated-operant conditions had reduced goal-directed control, but only after extended training. The free-operant group remained goal-directed, even after extended training, and their performance was not altered by stimulus presentations, suggesting effects of a stimulus-outcome association were unlikely to account for the deficit in the discriminative stimulus group. These results extend understanding of how stimuli present during instrumental training promote the development of habitual control.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDiscrimination LearningGoalsHabitsMaleRatsHabitInstrumental learningOutcome devaluationRat

Identifiers

PMID39639078
PMCPMC11621787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.