ArticleScientific reports2024
Stimulus conditions that promote habitual control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two experiments in rats examined how training where a stimulus signaled when to respond for reward, conditions that should favour S-R learning, might lead to habitual control of behaviour. Experiment 1 investigated how animals trained with a stimulus preceding lever insertion would impact learning relative to a group that was self-paced and could control lever insertion with a second, distinct response. Rats were then tested for sensitivity to outcome devaluation to distinguish between goal-directed and habitual control. We found that free-operant, self-paced conditions promoted goal-directed control while signaling trials with a stimulus promoted habitual control evidenced as insensitivity to outcome devaluation. Experiment 2 assessed whether the stimulus-outcome association is important for driving habitual responding when training occurs with a traditional discriminative stimulus. A comparison group was trained under free-operant conditions and experienced the same stimulus presented alongside the earned reward. Following devaluation, animals trained under discriminated-operant conditions had reduced goal-directed control, but only after extended training. The free-operant group remained goal-directed, even after extended training, and their performance was not altered by stimulus presentations, suggesting effects of a stimulus-outcome association were unlikely to account for the deficit in the discriminative stimulus group. These results extend understanding of how stimuli present during instrumental training promote the development of habitual control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.