Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Checkpoint data-driven GCN-GRU vehicle trajectory and traffic flow prediction.

Deyong Guan, Na Ren, Ke Wang, Qi Wang, Hualong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deyong GuanCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.
Na RenCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.
Ke WangCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China. wangke@sdust.edu.cn.
Qi WangCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.
Hualong ZhangCollege of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.52102417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of information technology, massive traffic data-driven short-term traffic situation analysis of urban road networks has become a research hotspot in urban traffic management. Accurate vehicle trajectory and traffic flow prediction can provide technical support for vehicle path planning and road congestion warning. Unlike most studies that use GPS data to predict vehicle trajectories, this paper combines the broad coverage, high reliability, and lighter weight of traffic checkpoint data to propose a method that uses trajectory prediction technology to forecast the traffic flow in urban road networks accurately. The method adopts a checkpoint data-driven approach for data collection, combines graph convolutional neural network (GCN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) models to more effectively learn and extract spatiotemporal correlation features of vehicle trajectories, which significantly improves the accuracy of vehicle trajectory prediction, and uses the output of the trajectory prediction model to forecast traffic flow more accurately. Firstly, transforming the checkpoint data into daily vehicle trajectories with time series characteristics, realizing the vehicle trajectory travel chain division. Secondly, the adjacency matrix is established by using the spatial relationship of each checkpoint, and the feature matrix of the vehicle's driving trajectory over time is established, which is used as the input of GCN to learn the spatial characteristics of the vehicle while driving on the road network, and then GRU is added to further process the data after GCN training, constructing a GCN-GRU vehicle trajectory prediction model for vehicle trajectory prediction. Finally, the traffic flow of each checkpoint is calculated based on the prediction result of vehicle trajectory and compared with the real checkpoint flow. This paper conducts many experiments on the Qingdao City Shinan district checkpoint dataset. The results show that compared with the single models GCN, GRU, BiGRU, and BiLSTM, the GCN-GRU model has reduced the MAE by 0.75, 0.46, 0.52, and 0.57, and the RMSE by 0.76, 0.52, 0.58, and 0.68, respectively, demonstrating stronger spatial and temporal correlation characteristics and higher prediction accuracy. The MAPE between the forecasted flow and the real flow is 0.18, which verifies the reliability of the proposed method.

Indexed as

Checkpoint dataGated Recurrent UnitsGraph Convolutional Neural NetworksTraffic flow forecastVehicle trajectory prediction

Identifiers

PMID39639046
PMCPMC11621339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.