ArticleBDJ open2024
Student confidence in clinical competence during dental education.
Article in BDJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, practices and clinical preparedness regarding porcelain laminate veneers among dental interns.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR).European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Adverse outcomes of post-core restorations performed by undergraduate and postgraduate dental students: a retrospective comparison.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dental residents in managing traumatic dental injuries.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Exploration and practice of comprehensive clinical rotation internship for undergraduate dental students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Self-Perceived Confidence and Clinical Preparedness in Restorative Dentistry Among Undergraduate Dental Students.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental education blends theoretical and practical training to prepare students for independent patient care. This study examines the confidence levels of dental students at Umeå University, Sweden regarding independent performance of general dentistry tasks, and whether this confidence changes after clinical training. MATERIAL AND
methodsSurveys were conducted before and after a summer clinical internship, with students rating their comfort levels on a scale from 0 to 10 for various procedures.
resultsResults from 64 initial surveys and 54 follow-up surveys showed no significant difference in confidence before and after the internship except for performing a tooth extraction (p = 0.010). However, confidence levels varied based on whether students had practiced specific tasks during the internship. DISCUSSION: Students felt least confident in managing acute dental trauma (mean 6.1-6.2) and treating cavities in young children (mean 6.2-6.7), while they were most confident in tasks like obtaining radiographic surveys (mean 8.5-8.6) and debriding periodontally compromised dentition (mean 8.2-8.3). Tooth extraction and dental fillings were the most practiced procedures during the internship.
conclusionsThe study concludes that the internship between the ninth and tenth semesters does not notably boost students' confidence in specific dental procedures except for dental extractions. This result can possibly be explained due to the short duration of the training. Further exploration, including input from clinical supervisors, is suggested to optimise clinical training in dental education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.