Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638972›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025

Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.

Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas DiehmVascular Institute Central Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland.
Dominique HirschleUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph KalkaVascular Institute Central Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland.
Hak Hong KeoVascular Institute Central Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland.
Vignes MohanVascular Institute Central Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland.
Martin Christian SchumacherDepartment of Urology, Hirslanden Clinic Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Andreas GutweinDivision of Angiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Dai-Do DoVascular Institute Central Switzerland, Aarau, Switzerland.
Hanno HoppeSwissIntervention Microtherapy Center, Bern, Switzerland. hanno.hoppe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5673-0035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND

methodsSingle-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.

resultsProcedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.

conclusionVenous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticImpotence, VasculogenicAdultAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeArterial revascularizationEmbolizationEndovascular treatmentVasculogenic erectile dysfunctionVenous leak

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.