Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638968›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Evaluation of the "Multivariable Psoriatic Arthritis Risk Estimation Tool" in a Cohort of Patients with Psoriasis: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

Ennio Lubrano, Filomena Mandato, Marcella Antenucci, Fabio Massimo Perrotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ennio LubranoAcademic Rheumatology Unit and MoRhe Project, Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "Vincenzo Tiberio", Università degli Studi del Molise, Via Giovanni Paolo II, C/da Tappino, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. enniolubrano@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-5328
Filomena MandatoDermatology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Regionale del Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Marcella AntenucciAcademic Rheumatology Unit and MoRhe Project, Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "Vincenzo Tiberio", Università degli Studi del Molise, Via Giovanni Paolo II, C/da Tappino, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Fabio Massimo PerrottaAcademic Rheumatology Unit and MoRhe Project, Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "Vincenzo Tiberio", Università degli Studi del Molise, Via Giovanni Paolo II, C/da Tappino, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-5205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn intriguing aspect that emerged in recent years is the transition phase from psoriasis (PsO) to psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The PRESTO instrument allows estimating a patient's risk of developing PsA based on a few clinical items. The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate the performance of the PRESTO tool in a cohort of patients with PsO.

methodsConsecutive patients with PsO were enrolled. Dermatological and rheumatological assessment was carried out in order to evaluate clinical features of PsO, to exclude the diagnosis of PsA, and to administer the PRESTO tool.

resultsBetween January 1, 2024 and April 1, 2024, 100 patients were assessed. Eight-four patients found the questionnaire to be very useful and easy. The estimated risk (median/IQR) of 1-year progression to PsA found in our group was 2.45% at 1 year (1.1-4).

conclusionsThe PRESTO instrument was feasible and well accepted by patients. The 1-year risk assessed by PRESTO tools is consistent with other reports in the literature.

Indexed as

PRESTOPsoriasisPsoriatic arthritisRiskTransition phase

Identifiers

PMID39638968
PMCPMC11751210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.