ReviewDrugs2025
Advanced-Stage Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Options for Difficult Treatment Situations.
Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined asciminib and olverembatinib in blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A small number of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) either present with or progress to the accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP). This occurs in approximately 4-7% of patients with CML. Most patients who progress to BP-CML are of myeloid lineage, while approximately 30% are of lymphoid lineage. Due to the rarity of this condition, there are no large or randomized trials that can inform clinical decisions. Most data are from retrospective chart reviews or data from old studies when tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were initially approved. In addition, the definition of these categories has been in continuous flux over the last 20 years, making applicability of data even more confusing. In some classifications, the cutoff is 30% blasts for the definition of BP-CML, while in others a cutoff of 20% is used. In addition, more recently the World Health Organization (WHO) classification omitted the accelerated phase and recognized only a two-phase disease, while the International Consensus Classification retained a three-phase definition and retained the accelerated phase. Therapy for patients with AP/BP-CML depends on several factors, including prior therapy, BCR::ABL1 mutation, co-morbidities, cell lineage, and eligibility for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). Patients with AP-CML at presentation have a relatively favorable prognosis and may not need alloHCT if they respond appropriately to therapy. For patients with AP-CML who progressed while on TKI therapy or those with BP-CML, alloHCT is considered the only curative therapy. Our goal is to review the available data on the therapy of patients with AP-CML and BP-CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.