Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638944›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Establishment of recurrent exposures reference levels for repeated computed tomography examinations in adult patients on a nationwide level in Slovakia.

Marco Brambilla, Marek Chmelík, Barbara Cannillo, Andrej Klepanec, Michal Lacko, Paolo Andreatta, Dušan Šalát

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco BrambillaMedical Physics Department, A.O.U. "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. marco.brambilla@maggioreosp.novara.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7338-3960
Marek ChmelíkDepartment of Technical Disciplines in Health Care, Faculty of Health Care, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
Barbara CannilloMedical Physics Department, A.O.U. "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Andrej KlepanecDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Comenius University and University Hospital Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michal LackoInstitute of Radiation Protection, Trenčín, Slovakia.
Paolo AndreattaMedical Physics Department, A.O.U. "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Dušan ŠalátInstitute of Radiation Protection, Trenčín, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study aims were: (1) to assess the incidence in 1 year, the cumulative incidences and the period prevalence in 3/5 years of the condition of patients accruing cumulative effective dose (CED) ≥ 100 mSv in health care centres providing CT examinations in Slovakia; and (2) to quantify their variability among different centres, to test the feasibility of establishing recurrent exposure reference levels (RERL) on a nationwide level. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data were tracked during five consecutive years using the CT dose index and dose-length-product along with the patient's ID. ED was calculated using conversion factors. Hospitals were stratified according to the number of beds in clinics (0), small (< 200), medium (201-500), or large (> 500) hospitals.

resultsThe database included 1,278,928 patients who underwent 2,157,508 CT exams in 5 years. The I

conclusionThe management of patients with recurrent CT exposures is highly variable among hospitals and unrelated to the size of the institution. Incidence should be reported instead of prevalence. KEY POINTS: Question Beyond just reporting statistics on recurrent imaging, the question which needs to be addressed is how to use such information to optimise patient protection. Findings In Slovakia the 5-year incidence of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv average 6% and range from 0.3% to 36.9% among different hospitals. Clinical relevance The incidence of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv is highly variable among hospitals and unrelated to their size. The heterogeneity in the radiation exposure of recurrent patients prompts the introduction of RERL to aid in the optimisation of patient protection.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageRadiation ExposureTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesSlovakiaComputed tomographyCumulated effective doseRadiation protection of patientsRecurrent exposures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.