Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638928›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Validation of the Assessment of Rehabilitation Needs Checklist in a Swedish cancer population.

Emma Ohlsson-Nevo, Maria Fogelkvist, Lars-Olov Lundqvist, Johan Ahlgren, Jan Karlsson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma Ohlsson-NevoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. emma.ohlsson-nevo@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6185-2328
Maria FogelkvistUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Lars-Olov LundqvistUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Johan AhlgrenDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Jan KarlssonUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of Rehabilitation Needs Checklist (ARNC), has been developed to assess rehabilitation need in cancer patients and is recommended by the Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden, known as Hälsoskattningen. The aim of the study was to test the reliability and validity of the ARNC, mainly by comparing it with the Distress thermometer and EORTC QLQ-C30. METHODOLOGY: A sample of 993 persons identified in the Swedish cancer register. The study participants were diagnosed with cancer in 2021 in the Mid Sweden region. The psychometric methods tested reliability and validity including factor analysis.

resultsThe response rate was 38%. The test-retest analysis showed that ICC was 0.80 or higher for 12 of the ARNC items. A strong or modarete correlation between ARNC and the other instruments was found in all functional scales and for most items. CFA of the 13-item two-factor model showed a RMSEA value of 0.04, CFI and TLI values of 0.97 and 0.96, and a SRMR value of 0.05, indicating a satisfactory model fit.

conclusionThe evaluation of the ARNC suggests that it is an acceptable and reliable screening instrument for detecting symptoms and signs indicating a possible need of rehabilitation. The medium to strong correlations between ARNC items and the EORTC QLQ- C30 items and scales suggest that ARNC could be an alternative also for research purposes when a shorter and less comprehensive instrument is needed. The simple design could be an advantage as it lowers the burden on cancer patients.

Indexed as

ChecklistNeoplasmsPsychometricsAdultAgedFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentQuality of LifeRegistriesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenCancer rehabilitationChecklistHälsoskattningSurveyValidation

Identifiers

PMID39638928
PMCPMC11621288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.