Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638854›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating deep learning models for classifying OCT images with limited data and noisy labels.

Aleksandar Miladinović, Alessandro Biscontin, Miloš Ajčević, Simone Kresevic, Agostino Accardo, Dario Marangoni, Daniele Tognetto, Leandro Inferrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aleksandar MiladinovićInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 1, Trieste, 34100, Italy. aleksandar.miladinovic@burlo.trieste.it.
Alessandro BiscontinInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 1, Trieste, 34100, Italy.
Miloš AjčevićDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Simone KresevicDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Agostino AccardoDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Dario MarangoniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Daniele TognettoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Leandro InferreraDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of deep learning for OCT image classification could enhance the diagnosis and monitoring of retinal diseases. However, challenges like variability in retinal abnormalities, noise, and artifacts in OCT images limit its clinical use. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of various deep learning (DL) architectures in classifying retinal pathologies versus healthy cases based on OCT images, under data scarcity and label noise. We examined five DL architectures: ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, VGG16, and InceptionV3. Fine-tuning of the pre-trained models was conducted on 5526 OCT images and reduced subsets down to 21 images to evaluate performance under data scarcity. The performance of models fine-tuned on subsets with label noise levels of 10%, 15%, and 20% was evaluated. All DL architectures achieved high classification accuracy (> 90%) with training sets of 345 or more images. InceptionV3 achieved the highest classification accuracy (99%) when trained on the entire training set. However, classification accuracy decreased and variability increased as sample size decreased. Label noise significantly affected model accuracy. Compensating for labeling errors of 10%, 15%, and 20% requires approximately 4, 9, and 14 times more images in the training set to reach the performance of 345 correctly labeled images. The results showed that DL models fine-tuned on sets of 345 or more OCT images can accurately classify retinal pathologies versus healthy controls. Our findings highlight that while mislabeling errors significantly impact classification performance in OCT analysis, this can be effectively mitigated by increasing the training sample size. By addressing data scarcity and labeling errors, our research aims to improve the real-world application and accuracy of retinal disease management.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinaRetinal DiseasesTomography, Optical CoherenceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCNNDeep learningOCTRetinaRetinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID39638854
PMCPMC11621707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.