ArticleScientific reports2024
Object-based feedback attention in convolutional neural networks improves tumour detection in digital pathology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Feedback Visual Network for Robust Small-Target Motion Detection in Complex Environments.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human visual attention allows prior knowledge or expectations to influence visual processing, allocating limited computational resources to only that part of the image that are likely to behaviourally important. Here, we present an image recognition system based on biological vision that guides attention to more informative locations within a larger parent image, using a sequence of saccade-like motions. We demonstrate that at the end of the saccade sequence the system has an improved classification ability compared to the convolutional neural network (CNN) that represents the feedforward part of the model. Feedback activations highlight salient image features supporting the explainability of the classification. Our attention model deviates substantially from more common feedforward attention mechanisms, which linearly reweight part of the input. This model uses several passes of feedforward and backward activation, which interact non-linearly. We apply our feedback architecture to histopathology patch images, demonstrating a 3.5% improvement in accuracy (p < 0.001) when retrospectively processing 59,057 9-class patches from 689 colorectal cancer WSIs. In the saccade implementation, overall agreement between expert-labelled patches and model prediction reached 93.23% for tumour tissue, surpassing inter-pathologist agreement. Our method is adaptable to other areas of science which rely on the analysis of extremely large-scale images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.