Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638838›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Surgical specialists face higher a risk for malpractice compared to their non-surgical colleagues.

Wouter J Dronkers, Jan M van Rees, Désirée Klemann, Dennis R Buis, Quirine J M A Amelink, Dirk J Grünhagen, M M Mokhles, W Peter Vandertop, Marike L B Broekman, Aart C Hendriks and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wouter J DronkersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Jan M van ReesDepartment of General Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Désirée KlemannDepartment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dennis R BuisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Quirine J M A AmelinkErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk J GrünhagenDepartment of General Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M M MokhlesDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W Peter VandertopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marike L B BroekmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Aart C HendriksFaculty of Law, Leiden University School of Law, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eric BoersmaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clemens M F DirvenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jochem K H SpoorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. j.spoor@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous studies, surgical specialties accounted for most malpractice claims. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk for malpractice claims for physicians working in hospitals. A retrospective observational study using anonymized closed malpractice claims between 2007 up to 2021 from two Dutch insurers was carried out. Main outcomes involved claim volume & outcome, and the estimated annual risk (EAR) for a claim per year for the individual physician from all specialties. Sustained or settled claims were considered unfavorable for the physician (UOP). Surgical specialists, involving surgical specialties and specialties with surgical characteristics accounted for 77% (14,330/18,649) of the claims closed. Liability was denied in 51% of the claims (n = 9,487). The remaining claims were sustained (granted) (n = 4,600; 25%), settled (n = 3,444; 18%) or closed without decision (n = 1118; 6%). Surgeons faced an average EAR of 21.6% (range 6.5 - 28%) which was higher compared to colleagues from specialties with surgical characteristics (EAR 7.3%; range 2.9 - 10.1%) and non-surgical specialties (EAR 2.5%; range 0.9 - 4.4%). Surgical specialists received more claims than their non-surgical colleagues. Relative to specialty size, surgeons faced a higher risk for a claim in general, as well as for a claim with an unfavorable outcome.

Indexed as

MalpracticeSpecialties, SurgicalFemaleHumansLiability, LegalMaleNetherlandsPhysiciansRetrospective StudiesSurgeonsClaimHealth lawMalpracticeMedical litigationNegligenceSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39638838
PMCPMC11621327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.