Observational studyScientific reports2024
Surgical specialists face higher a risk for malpractice compared to their non-surgical colleagues.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fear of malpractice, anxiety levels, and defensive medicine practices among rhinoplasty surgeons: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Medical malpractice in pediatric surgery: an analysis of Supreme Court decisions involving physicians.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In previous studies, surgical specialties accounted for most malpractice claims. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk for malpractice claims for physicians working in hospitals. A retrospective observational study using anonymized closed malpractice claims between 2007 up to 2021 from two Dutch insurers was carried out. Main outcomes involved claim volume & outcome, and the estimated annual risk (EAR) for a claim per year for the individual physician from all specialties. Sustained or settled claims were considered unfavorable for the physician (UOP). Surgical specialists, involving surgical specialties and specialties with surgical characteristics accounted for 77% (14,330/18,649) of the claims closed. Liability was denied in 51% of the claims (n = 9,487). The remaining claims were sustained (granted) (n = 4,600; 25%), settled (n = 3,444; 18%) or closed without decision (n = 1118; 6%). Surgeons faced an average EAR of 21.6% (range 6.5 - 28%) which was higher compared to colleagues from specialties with surgical characteristics (EAR 7.3%; range 2.9 - 10.1%) and non-surgical specialties (EAR 2.5%; range 0.9 - 4.4%). Surgical specialists received more claims than their non-surgical colleagues. Relative to specialty size, surgeons faced a higher risk for a claim in general, as well as for a claim with an unfavorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.