ArticleScientific reports2024
Dynamic [
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dynamic SPECT Assessment of Hepatic Function in Patients With Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT-derived liver fibrosis quantification independently predicts post-hepatectomy liver failure: a histologically validated study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- New Horizons: The Evolution of Nuclear Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Liver Function in Rat Models of Acute Liver Failure Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Cytokine Levels.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt least 20% of the future liver remnant must function properly after liver tumor resection to avoid post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). [
aimTo evaluate the value of dynamic [
methodsThirty-five patients underwent dynamic [
resultsThe total liver filtration was inversely correlated with the ICG-R15 and MELD-Na score. Twenty-four patients underwent major liver resection due to an adequate FLR rate and did not die within 90 days after the procedure. ROC analysis revealed that the FLR filtration was a significant predictor of PHLF. The best cutoff value for FLR filtration was 2.72%/min/m
conclusionDynamic [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.