GuidelineAnais brasileiros de dermatologia
II Consensus of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology for the treatment of alopecia areata.
Guideline in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Indicated for Severe Alopecia Areata: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.The Journal of dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Patterns of Clinical Response in Rollover Adolescent Patients with Alopecia Areata Treated with Ritlecitinib in the Ongoing Long-Term, Open-Label, Phase 3 ALLEGRO-LT Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-world Burden of Disease and Clinical Characteristics of Alopecia Areata Among Adults in Brazil: Results from a Cross-sectional Survey.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Alopecia areata: current concepts.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Evidence Synthesis Gone Awry: The Perils of Aggregating Ineffective or Unsafe Doses in Alopecia Areata Reviews.Cureus · 2026Article
- Inflammatory Skin Disease in Latin America: Treatment Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlopecia areata is a highly frequent disease with great variability in clinical presentation, severity, and prognosis. It has a significant negative impact on quality of life, especially in the moderate and severe forms.
objectiveTo disseminate guidelines, prepared by a group of Brazilian experts, for the treatment and follow-up of patients with alopecia areata.
methodsEight specialists from different university centers with experience in alopecia areata were appointed by the Brazilian Society of Dermatology to reach a consensus on its treatment. Using the adapted DELPHI methodology, relevant elements were considered and then an analysis of the recent literature was carried out and the text produced. Consensus on the guidelines was defined with the approval of at least 70% of the panel of experts. RESULTS/
conclusionsTreatments vary according to patient age and disease severity. Intralesional injectable corticosteroid therapy was considered the first option for localized disease in adults. In severe cases, Janus Kinase inhibitors are the treatment with the highest level of evidence. Systemic corticosteroid therapy and immunosuppressants (corticosteroid-sparing agents) are also options in these cases. Contact immunotherapy (diphencyprone) is an alternative for stable extensive cases. The assessment of side effects is as important as the hair regrowth rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.