ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Nucleated red blood cells for characterization of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negative correlation between serial changes in the reticulocyte number and C-reactive protein level in dogs with delayed reticulocytosis.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Nucleated red blood cells in critically ill cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Nucleated red blood cells for characterization of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) are increased by disease processes and hematopoietic stress.
objectivesTo evaluate the utility of nRBCs as a marker of disease severity and prognosis in dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). ANIMALS: Sixty-two client-owned dogs met the criteria of SIRS without anemia.
methodsnRBC-positive (nRBCs: ≥5/500, n = 32) and nRBC-negative (nRBCs: <5/500, n = 30) dogs were classified, and clinicopathological data, Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE
resultsThe median WBC (17.63, interquartile range [IQR]: 11.72-20.24 × 10 CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Measuring peripheral nRBCs in dogs with SIRS is rapid and clinically applicable, reflecting disease severity and associated prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.