Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638635›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Key Decision-Making in Post-Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Fracture Healing's Impact on Femoral Component Selection.

Jiexin Huang, Jiagu Huang, Haiqi Ding, Jianhua Lyu, Changyu Huang, Yang Chen, Qijin Wang, Hongyan Li, Baijian Wu, Ying Huang and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiexin HuangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3356-6418
Jiagu HuangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5487-3212
Haiqi DingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-290X
Jianhua LyuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-6181
Changyu HuangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Quanzhou Orthopedic-Traumatological, Quanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-9181
Yang ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7168-7098
Qijin WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-653X
Hongyan LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-610X
Baijian WuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5738-6595
Ying HuangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-6290
Minghui YangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-1247
Xinyu FangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6337-8009
Wenming ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-7279

Funding

Major Scientific Research Program for Young and Middle-aged Health Professionals of Fujian Province, China 2023ZQNZD007Nanping Natural Science Foundation N2021J022University-Industry Research Cooperation Project of Science and Technology, Fujian Province 2022Y4003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFollowing failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (FIF-ITF), the decision to use a long-stem or standard-stem femoral implant in hip arthroplasty is still debated. This study aimed to explore how the healing status of fractures after FIF-ITF failure affects the choice of femoral stem and clinical outcomes.

methodsOur retrospective cohort study reviewed 105 cases of patients with FIF-ITF who underwent hip arthroplasty at three tertiary Grade A hospitals between December 2012 and December 2022. We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with healed and unhealed fractures, focusing on the selection of femoral stems in relation to proximal medial support and the healing status of the greater trochanter. The primary outcomes measured were functional results, operative time, blood loss, and incidence of complications. A subgroup analysis was conducted to further evaluate the influence of the proximal medial buttress and greater trochanteric healing on femoral stem selection. Statistical analysis included binary and ordinal logistic regression to identify factors influencing the choice of femoral stems. Additionally, a decision tree model was developed to visually represent and explore the relationship between fracture healing status and the selection of femoral components.

resultsThe study included 38 patients with healed fractures and 67 patients with unhealed fractures. Patients in the healed group predominantly chose standard stems and experienced better functional outcomes (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). In contrast, the unhealed group preferred long stems, resulting in longer surgical durations and increased blood loss (p = 0.008, p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that nonunion of the proximal femoral medial buttress was an independent risk factor for long stems (p < 0.0001, OR = 10.402).

conclusionThe selection of femoral prostheses following FIF-ITF is influenced by the fracture healing status, particularly the presence of proximal femoral medial buttress. The decision tree model suggested that long-stem prostheses are more appropriate when there is inadequate fracture healing and the proximal femoral medial buttress is absent.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipClinical Decision-MakingFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHip FracturesHip ProsthesisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Failuredecision tree modelfailed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracturesfemoral stem selectionfracture healing statuship arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39638635
PMCPMC11787966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.