Trial reportBMJ open2024
Factors associated with declining a menstrual cup among female students and their parents in Ugandan secondary schools: a cross-sectional study.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA greater choice of menstrual products may improve menstrual health (MH). This study assessed factors associated with declining consent to receive a menstrual cup by parents and female students participating in a MH intervention trial in Ugandan schools.
methodsWe analysed baseline data from a cluster-randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of a multicomponent MH intervention among female students in 60 Ugandan secondary schools. Parental consent and student assent to receive a menstrual cup and training on its use was sought separately from consent from other trial activities. Random-effects logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CIs for factors associated with (i) parents or guardians declining the cup and (ii) students declining the cup using hierarchical conceptual frameworks.
resultsThe baseline trial population comprised 3705 post-menarchal students (mean age 15.6 (SD 0.9 years), of whom 2048 (55.3%) were day students. Among the parents of the 3635 participants aged <18 years, 1566 (43.1%) declined consent for their student to receive the cup. This was higher in Wakiso District than in Kalungu District (52.9% vs 8.0%, p<0.001). Parental decline of the cup differed by ethnicity, and this association varied between districts (p=0.004). Overall, 20.5% students declined the cup (Kalungu 21.1%, Wakiso 20.2%, p=0.62). Student decline of the cup was higher among day than boarding students (aOR=1.40, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.84), those with academic performance above the median score (aOR=1.29, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.65), those whose menstrual practice needs score was above the median (aOR=1.36, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.72) and those with more negative attitudes to MH (aOR=1.46, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.83).
conclusionAmong Ugandan students and their parents, declining consent to receive a menstrual cup varied by district and ethnicity as well as academic performance and menstrual-related factors. A contextual understanding of the barriers for uptake of the menstrual cup is needed to guide future interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN45461276.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.