Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638459›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2024

Vasectomy Discussions in South Korea: Central Themes and Public Interest on Question-and-Answer Social Platforms.

Ho Seong Kang, Jung Yoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Evolving Landscape of Urology.International neurourology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ho Seong KangGeneral Graduate School, Department of Game Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.
Jung Yoon KimDepartment of Game Media, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Gachon University GCU-202106480001Ministry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1F1A1066602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore public perceptions and key issues related to vasectomy in South Korea. In particular, this paper seeks to analyze how vasectomy is discussed on question-and-answer (Q&A) social platforms including NAVER Jisik iN (knowledge exchange service between NAVER users) and to identify topics that capture public interest.

methodsIn this study, based on data collected on NAVER Jisik iN from July 2019 to July 2024 with the keyword 'vasectomy,' this paper performs a co-occurrence matrix analysis on the Q&A data to identify key terms related to the topic. By applying connection centrality and community detection techniques, this paper visualizes and examines the network graph to uncover relationships between words and identify the primary topics of discussion.

resultsThe co-occurrence matrix analysis reveals that keywords such as 'surgery,' 'vasectomy,' and 'contraception' play a central role in discussions about vasectomies. Both the Q&A data highlight the vasectomy procedure and contraceptive effectiveness as primary topics of discussion. The visualization graphs intuitively display the centrality and strength of connections between these keywords, as well as the interrelatedness of topics through distinct community groups.

conclusionThe analysis shows that the questions primarily focused on the surgical procedure, while the answers were more concerned with contraceptive effectiveness and physiological aspects. These results suggest that the public's interest in vasectomy is closely linked to its effectiveness, potential side effects, and related social issues.

Indexed as

Co-occurrence matrixNAVER Jisik iN, Data analysisSocial mediaSocial network analysisVasectomy

Identifiers

PMID39638459
PMCPMC11627229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.