Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638424›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2024

Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians.

Joanne E Coster, Fiona C Sampson, Rachel O'Hara, Jaqui Long, Fiona Bell, Steve Goodacre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanne E CosterThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield, UK j.e.coster@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-4222
Fiona C SampsonThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-0302
Rachel O'HaraThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-6854
Jaqui LongThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield, UK.
Fiona BellYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-1903
Steve GoodacreThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulance clinicians use pre-alert calls to inform emergency departments (EDs) about the arrival of critically ill patients. However, there is variation in guidance between local ambulance service policies in terms of what should be pre-alerted and how pre-alerts should happen. We conducted a national online survey to understand the use of ambulance pre-alerts and to inform recommendations for practice and guidance.

methodsAmbulance clinicians in England involved in pre-alert decision-making were recruited via ambulance trusts and social media to complete an anonymous online survey conducted during May-July 2023. Quantitative data was analysed descriptively using SPSS (version 28) and free-text responses are reported to illustrate the quantitative findings.

resultsWe included 1298 valid responses from 10 English ambulance services. There was variation in practice at all stages of the pre-alert process, including the reported frequency of pre-alert (7.1% several times a shift, 14.9% once/two times per month). Most respondents reported that pre-alerts were delivered directly to the ED, but 32.8% reported pre-alerting via an ambulance control room. A third of respondents always used mnemonics to guide a pre-alert (eg, ATMIST (Age, Time of Incident, Mechanism of injury, Injuries, Signs, Treatments)), but 10.2% reported not using any fixed format.The type of guidance used to identify patients for pre-alert varied between clinicians and ambulance services, with local ambulance service guidance being most commonly used, and 20% stating they never use national guidelines. Respondents reported variable understanding of appropriate conditions for pre-alert, with paramedic students particularly wanted further guidance on trauma in older patients and medical pre-alerts. 29% of respondents reported receiving specific pre-alert training, while 50% reported never receiving feedback.

conclusionWe identified variation in pre-alert processes and practices that may result in uncertainty and challenges for ambulance clinicians providing time-critical care. Guidance and training on the use of pre-alerts may promote more consistent processes and practices.

Indexed as

AmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationemergency ambulance systemsemergency care systemsguidelinepre-hospital

Identifiers

PMID39638424
PMCPMC11874312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.