ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
Approach to prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants by passive immunization.
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo support family physicians in discussing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunizations with patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Information was obtained through a literature review on the burden of RSV disease in infants; observational studies; randomized controlled trials; evidence presented by review agencies; product monographs; and National Advisory Committee on Immunization statements. MAIN MESSAGE: There are now 3 options available for preventing severe RSV disease in infants: the monoclonal antibody palivizumab, the long-acting monoclonal antibody nirsevimab, and the new RSVpreF vaccine administered during pregnancy. Only a small number of infants at high risk of severe RSV disease are eligible for palivizumab. Nirsevimab has received Health Canada authorization for all infants and RSVpreF has received authorization for all pregnant women and pregnant people. There are multiple considerations for the use of each product, including authorization; availability; timing of administration; health status and social determinants of health of the infant; efficacy and effectiveness; safety; patient preference; and cost. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization has recently issued guidance on the use of RSV immunization products for infants.
conclusionFamily doctors should be aware of the indications, relative benefits, and recommendations for the 3 RSV immunization products to have informed discussions with patients, taking into account the preferences and circumstances of the pregnant woman or pregnant person or of the parent and infant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.