Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638300›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2025

Air Passengers' Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection With a 14-Day Quarantine and Accuracy Assessment of a Symptom-based Screening System at an Airport.

Toonlaya Direkwutthikun, Chanapong Rojanaworarit, Isabella Andrade, Bhanasut Hunsajarupan, Nuttawoot Photisan, Pattarasuda Sookchom, Thawabhorn Jannok, Rome Buathong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Toonlaya DirekwutthikunInstitute of Preventive Medicine, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chanapong RojanaworaritDepartment of Population Health, School of Health Sciences, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Isabella AndradeMaster of Public Health Program, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Bhanasut HunsajarupanInstitute of Preventive Medicine, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Nuttawoot PhotisanDivision of Public Health and Environment, Pho Krasang Municipal District, Sisaket, Thailand.
Pattarasuda SookchomInstitute of Preventive Medicine, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Thawabhorn JannokDivision of International Communicable Disease Control Ports and Quarantine, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Rome BuathongDivision of International Communicable Disease Control Ports and Quarantine, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to validate the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, identify infection risk factors among air passengers subject to a 14-day mandatory quarantine, and evaluate the accuracy of mass symptom-based screening criteria at an airport.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 116 004 air passengers who entered Thailand through Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok from April 2020 to September 2020. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, risk characteristics, and accuracy indices of symptom-based screening were calculated.

resultsThe overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 was 0.5%, or 540 infections per 100 000 air passengers. Identified risk factors included sex, nationality, continent of departure, on-arrival screening results, and month of travel. Positive screening results indicated a higher risk and positive likelihood ratio for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the on-arrival screening criteria demonstrated low sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

conclusionsThe current study confirms previous findings that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during air travel is low. However, this might result from strict pre-departure screening and the SARS-CoV-2 test requirement for arriving passengers. The symptom-based screening criteria used upon arrival showed a low probability of identifying positive cases, suggesting that incorporating additional criteria could help detect asymptomatic infections. The integrated screening and quarantine model proved effective in preventing the spread of the virus into local communities.

Indexed as

AirportsAir TravelCOVID-19Mass ScreeningQuarantineAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2ThailandCOVID-19EpidemiologyQuarantineSARS-CoV-2ScreeningTravel medicine

Identifiers

PMID39638300
PMCPMC11824645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.