ArticleBiological psychiatry2025
Data-Driven Analysis Identifies Novel Modulation of Social Behavior in Female Mice Witnessing Chronic Social Defeat Stress.
Article in Biological psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress-induced adaptations in nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptor-expressing cells correspond to social avoidance behavior in male mice.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Post stress sensory contact with a male mouse is associated with altered social behavior in a female vicarious social defeat stress model.Experimental animals · 2026Article
- Review
- Male and female mice are similarly susceptible to chronic nondiscriminatory social defeat stress despite differences in attack frequency from aggressor.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Sex-specific exploration accounts for differences in valence learning in male and female mice.eLife · 2025Article
- Correspondence between sleep patterns and anhedonia in adult male mice exposed to early-life stress.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic social defeat stress is a widely used depression model in male mice. Several proposed adaptations extend this model to females with variable, often marginal effects. We examined if the widely used male-defined metrics of stress are suboptimal in females witnessing defeat.
methodsUsing a data-driven method, we comprehensively classified social interaction behavior in 761 male and female mice after chronic social witness/defeat stress, examining social modulation of behavior and associations with conventional metrics (i.e., social interaction ratio).
resultsSocial stress induced distinct behavioral adaptation patterns in defeated males and witness females. Social interaction ratio led to underpowered analyses in witness females with limited utility to differentiate susceptibility/resilience. Data-driven analyses revealed changes in social adaptation in witness females that were captured in attenuated velocity change from no target to target trials. We explored the utility of this metric in 4 female social stress models and in male witnesses. Combining social interaction ratio and velocity change optimally differentiated susceptibility/resilience in witness females and revealed resilient-specific adaptation in a resilience-associated neural circuit in female mice.
conclusionsChronic witness stress induced behavioral changes in females that were qualitatively distinct from those observed in defeated males and not adequately sampled by standard male-defined metrics. Modulation of locomotion is a robust and easily implementable metric for rigorous research in witness female mice. Overall, our findings highlight the need to critically evaluate sex differences in behavior and implement sex-based considerations in preclinical model design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.