Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39638149›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025

Feasibility of fetal cardiac function and anatomy assessment by real-time spiral balanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging at 0.55T.

Ye Tian, Jon Detterich, Jay D Pruetz, Ecrin Yagiz, John C Wood, Krishna S Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ye TianMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: ytian607@usc.edu.
Jon DetterichChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jay D PruetzChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ecrin YagizMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
John C WoodChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Krishna S NayakMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Volumetric Real-Time MRI at 0.55 TeslaU01HL167613 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Adrienne Campbell, Krishna Shrinivas Nayak · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
Improved Fetal Screening using 0.55T MRIR01HD115284 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI Krishna Shrinivas Nayak, JOHN C WOOD · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
Improved Myocardial Perfusion Assessment using High-Performance Low-Field MRIR21HL159533 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NAYAK, KRISHNA S · 2022 to 2023
$454k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL159533NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL167613NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD115284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary 0.55T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is promising for fetal MRI, due to the larger bore, reduced safety concerns, lower acoustic noise, and improved fast imaging capability. In this work, we explore improved fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) without relying on any synchronizing devices, prospective, or retrospective gating, to determine the feasibility of real-time MRI evaluation of fetal cardiac function as well as cardiac and great vessel anatomies by using spiral balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) at 0.55T.

methodsA real-time spiral bSSFP pulse sequence for fetal CMR was implemented and optimized on a 0.55T whole-body MRI. Fetal CMR was prospectively performed between May 2022 and August 2023. The protocol included (1) real-time images at standard cardiac views, for 10-20 s/view and 40-43.6 ms/frame and (2) 4-9 stacks of slices at standard cardiac views that each cover the whole heart, with 15-30 slices/stack, and 2-5 s/slice, at 320-349 ms/frame. Images were evaluated by a fetal cardiologist. Quantitative measurements of cardiothoracic area ratio and cardiac axis were compared with previous reports. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against postnatal echocardiographic findings.

resultsTwenty-nine participants were enrolled for 32 CMR exams, with mean maternal age 33.6 ± 5.8 years (range 22-44 years) and mean gestational age 32.8 ± 3.9 weeks (range 23-38 weeks). The proposed sequence enabled evaluation of the fetal heart in <30 min in all cases (average 22 min). Real-time MRI allowed easy adjustment of scan plan, automatic whole-heart volumetric sweeping, and flexible choice of reconstruction temporal resolution. For key cardiac anatomic features, 60% (315/527) were delineated well. Mean cardiothoracic area ratio and cardiac axis were 0.27 ± 0.04 and 45.8 ± 7.8 degrees. Diagnostic agreement with postnatal echocardiographic findings was 84% (26/31).

conclusionA spiral real-time bSSFP pulse sequence at 0.55T can provide both low-framerate and high-framerate fetal heart images without relying on maternal breath-hold, specialized gating devices, or cardiac gating. The low-framerate images offer high diagnostic quality structural evaluations of the fetal heart, while the high-framerate images capture fetal heart motion and may enable functional assessments.

Indexed as

Fetal HeartHeart Defects, CongenitalMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrenatal DiagnosisAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyProspective StudiesTime Factors0.55TBalanced steady-state free precessionFetalReal-timeSpiral

Identifiers

PMID39638149
PMCPMC12182825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.