ReviewClinical implant dentistry and related research2025
Biomechanical Basis for Bone Healing and Osseointegration of Implants in Sinus Grafts.
Review in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Bone Remodeling Dynamics and Bone Vitality Following Standard Bone Augmentation Procedures: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Revisited: A Multimodal Evaluation of Bone Preservation and Regeneration-Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Short dental implants versus sinus lift with longer implants.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Volumetric changes in the maxillary sinus following orthodontic disimpaction of unilaterally impacted maxillary canines: a prospective CBCT-based split-mouth study.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Wedge-Shaped Implants Inserted in Narrow Ridges: A 7-Year Follow-Up Multicenter Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from InfuseJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Characteristics of Occlusal Force and Masticatory Performance in Female Patients Who Selected Implant Treatment for a Missing Mandibular Second Molar: A Retrospective Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- What are the radiographic prevalence and anatomical patterns of maxillary sinus septa in a Turkish cohort?BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Fluid-Dynamic Crestal Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Implant Rehabilitation with Hyaluronic Acid: A Prospective Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A thorough comprehension of the mechanisms controlling new bone formation and implant osseointegration after maxillary sinus floor elevation is crucial for aligning our treatment choices with biological principles and enhancing clinical outcomes. The goal of bone regeneration in sinus lift procedures is to provide a sufficient amount of newly-formed tissue to support implant osseointegration. However, it is still unclear whether there is a minimum quantity of vital bone within the newly-formed tissue required for effective support, though it is generally assumed that vital bone is essential for this process. The source and integration of new bone in maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures remain debated. Most clinical studies suggest a paramount role for sinus floor and bony walls, with a centripetal pattern of new bone formation, while conflicting reports exist regarding the osteogenic role of the Schneiderian membrane. The influence of mechanical input on peri-implant bone formation, mineralization, and maturation is significant, with bone remodeling regulated by mechanical strains generated during loading. Defining optimal loading for implants, particularly in sinus lift procedures, is challenging, as early loading may damage interfacial tissue, interfering with osteogenesis. Differences in osseointegration dynamics between native and augmented bone may arise from biological and mechanical factors, but also from patient-specific factors which should be evaluated in treatment planning. Factors to consider include sinus anatomy, patient and site-specific regenerative potential, and the selection of graft material that matches the osteogenic and mechanical requirements. Tailored approaches integrating patient-specific considerations and refined implant strategies will enhance predictability and longevity of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.