SynthesisMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2025
Racial Discrimination and Multiple Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Synthesis in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of photobiomodulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Cash Transfers and Psychiatric Hospitalization for At-Risk Populations in Brazil.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- The perception paradox: experiencing and witnessing skin color discrimination and self-rated health in Latin America.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Measuring Perceived Discrimination and Its Consequences for Latino Health.Societies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to systematically investigate the associations between racial discrimination and various health outcomes and to evaluate the certainty of evidence from existing meta-analyses of observational studies.
methodWe systemically searched the associations between racial discrimination and health outcomes for PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS, and Google Scholar up until January 31, 2024. Notably, the included studies were predominantly conducted in the USA and Europe, limiting the generalizability of our findings to a global context.
resultsEight meta-analyses of observational studies involving over 1 million individuals were included, describing 15 potential health outcomes related to racial discrimination. The quality assessment revealed that most included meta-analyses were of low quality. For oncological health outcomes, significant associations were found with the mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); black patients had a higher risk, while Asian patients had a lower risk when compared to white patients. In addition, black patients with disparities on the cancer care continuum are a protective factor for early-stage HCC diagnosis. For gastroenterological health outcomes, Hispanic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and black patients with socioeconomic status/differential access to health care, compared to white patients (reference), showed significant associations. For mental health outcomes, racial discriminations were significantly associated with increased odds of psychotic experiences, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempts. Numerous significant associations were from weak to suggestive evidence levels, indicating variability in the evidence.
conclusionDespite the complexity of measuring its impact, racial discrimination shows a profound influence across clinical areas, including an unexpected protective association in early-stage HCC diagnosis among black patients.
objectiveWe aimed to systematically investigate the associations between racial discrimination and various health outcomes and to evaluate the certainty of evidence from existing meta-analyses of observational studies.
methodWe systemically searched the associations between racial discrimination and health outcomes for PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS, and Google Scholar up until January 31, 2024. Notably, the included studies were predominantly conducted in the USA and Europe, limiting the generalizability of our findings to a global context.
resultsEight meta-analyses of observational studies involving over 1 million individuals were included, describing 15 potential health outcomes related to racial discrimination. The quality assessment revealed that most included meta-analyses were of low quality. For oncological health outcomes, significant associations were found with the mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); black patients had a higher risk, while Asian patients had a lower risk when compared to white patients. In addition, black patients with disparities on the cancer care continuum are a protective factor for early-stage HCC diagnosis. For gastroenterological health outcomes, Hispanic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and black patients with socioeconomic status/differential access to health care, compared to white patients (reference), showed significant associations. For mental health outcomes, racial discriminations were significantly associated with increased odds of psychotic experiences, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempts. Numerous significant associations were from weak to suggestive evidence levels, indicating variability in the evidence.
conclusionDespite the complexity of measuring its impact, racial discrimination shows a profound influence across clinical areas, including an unexpected protective association in early-stage HCC diagnosis among black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.