Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637677›Full record

ArticlePlacenta2025

A transcriptomic comparison of in vitro models of the human placenta.

Samantha Lapehn, Sidharth Nair, Evan J Firsick, James MacDonald, Ciara Thoreson, James A Litch, Nicole R Bush, Leena Kadam, Sylvie Girard, Leslie Myatt and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Placenta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current approaches and advances in placental toxicology.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Samantha LapehnCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Electronic address: Samantha.LapehnYoung@seattlechildrens.org.
Sidharth NairCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Evan J FirsickCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
James MacDonaldDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Ciara ThoresonGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Lynwood, WA, 98036, USA.
James A LitchGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Lynwood, WA, 98036, USA.
Nicole R BushDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Leena KadamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Sylvie GirardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Leslie MyattDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Bhagwat PrasadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, 99202, USA.
Sheela SathyanarayanaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Alison G PaquetteCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Nicole Ann Errett · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Prenatal and Early Childhood Pathways To Health:  An Integrated Model of Chemical and Social Exposures, Biological Mechanisms, and Sex-Specific Effects on Neurodevelopment and Respiratory OutcomesUH3OD023271 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUSH, NICOLE RENEE, KARR, CATHERINE J · 2018 to 2022
$37.3M
DiversitySupp-ONES-Prenatal Phthalate ExposureR01ES033785 · NIEHS · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Alison Genevieve Paquette · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES033785NIH HHS UH3 OD023271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelecting an in vitro culture model of the human placenta is challenging due to representation of different trophoblast cell types with distinct biological roles and limited comparative studies that define key characteristics of these models. The aim of this research was to compare the transcriptomes of common in vitro models of the human placenta compared to bulk human placental tissue.

methodsWe performed differential gene expression analysis on publicly available transcriptomic data from 7 in vitro models of the human placenta (HTR-8/SVneo, BeWo, JEG-3, JAR, Primary Trophoblasts, Villous Explants, and Trophoblast Stem Cells) and compared to bulk placental tissue from 2 cohort studies (CANDLE and GAPPS) or individual trophoblast cell types derived from bulk placental tissue.

resultsAll in vitro placental models had a substantial number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, FDR<0.01) compared to the CANDLE and GAPPS placentas (Average DEGs = 10,624), and the individual trophoblast cell types (Average DEGs = 5413), indicating that there are vast differences in gene expression. Hierarchical clustering identified 54 gene clusters with distinct expression profiles across placental models, with 23 clusters enriched for specific KEGG pathways. Placental cell lines were classified by fetal sex based on expression of Y-chromosome genes that identified HTR-8/SVneo cells as female origin, while JEG-3, JAR, and BeWo cells are of male origin. DISCUSSION: None of the models were a close approximation of the human bulk placental transcriptome, highlighting the challenges with model selection. To enable appropriate model selection, we adapted our data into a web application: "Comparative Transcriptomic Placental Model Atlas (CTPMA)".

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlacentaTranscriptomeTrophoblastsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPregnancyIn vitroPlacentaRNA sequencingTranscriptomeTrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID39637677
PMCPMC11857522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.