ArticleMedical image analysis2025
Self-supervised graph contrastive learning with diffusion augmentation for functional MRI analysis and brain disorder detection.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in artificial intelligence for neuroimaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Multimodal Representation Learning for Parsing Biological Heterogeneity in Psychiatric Neuroimaging.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Enhancing depression diagnosis with augmented brain signal driven decorrelated graph neural networks.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- VarCoNet: A Variability-Aware Self-Supervised Framework for Functional Connectome Extraction From Resting-State fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- US-ATHC: Unsupervised Multi-Class Glioma Segmentation via Adaptive Thresholding and Clustering.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Article
- Multimodal contrastive learning on rs-fMRI to quantify whole-brain network recovery after hypothalamic hamartoma surgery.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) provides a non-invasive imaging technique to study patterns of brain activity, and is increasingly used to facilitate automated brain disorder analysis. Existing fMRI-based learning methods often rely on labeled data to construct learning models, while the data annotation process typically requires significant time and resource investment. Graph contrastive learning offers a promising solution to address the small labeled data issue, by augmenting fMRI time series for self-supervised learning. However, data augmentation strategies employed in these approaches may damage the original blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals, thus hindering subsequent fMRI feature extraction. In this paper, we propose a self-supervised graph contrastive learning framework with diffusion augmentation (GCDA) for functional MRI analysis. The GCDA consists of a pretext model and a task-specific model. In the pretext model, we first augment each brain functional connectivity network derived from fMRI through a graph diffusion augmentation (GDA) module, and then use two graph isomorphism networks with shared parameters to extract features in a self-supervised contrastive learning manner. The pretext model can be optimized without the need for labeled training data, while the GDA focuses on perturbing graph edges and nodes, thus preserving the integrity of original BOLD signals. The task-specific model involves fine-tuning the trained pretext model to adapt to downstream tasks. Experimental results on two rs-fMRI cohorts with a total of 1230 subjects demonstrate the effectiveness of our method compared with several state-of-the-arts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.