ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Deep learning-based overall survival prediction in patients with glioblastoma: An automatic end-to-end workflow using pre-resection basic structural multiparametric MRIs.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI for prognosis and treatment stratification in glioblastoma neurosurgery: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Recurrence in High-Grade Glioma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative Cross-Modal Fusion of Preoperative MRI and Histopathological Signatures for Improved Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based cross-attention fusion of multimodal MRI for survival prediction and risk stratification in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based quantification of tumor infiltration in the non-enhancing peritumoral region on postoperative MRI is associated with survival in glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Glioblastoma Radiotherapy Planning and Treatment.Cancers · 2025Review
- PHSP-Net: Personalized Habitat-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Center Glioblastoma Survival Prediction Using Multiparametric MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate and automated early survival prediction is critical for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) as their poor prognosis requires timely treatment decision-making. To address this need, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based end-to-end workflow for GBM overall survival (OS) prediction using pre-resection basic structural multiparametric magnetic resonance images (Bas-mpMRI) with a multi-institutional public dataset and evaluated it with an independent dataset of patients on a prospective institutional clinical trial. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe proposed end-to-end workflow includes a skull-stripping model, a GBM sub-region segmentation model and an ensemble learning-based OS prediction model. The segmentation model utilizes skull-stripped Bas-mpMRIs to segment three GBM sub-regions. The segmented GBM is fed into the contrastive learning-based OS prediction model to classify the patients into different survival groups. Our datasets include both a multi-institutional public dataset from Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge 2020 with 235 patients, and an institutional dataset from a 5-fraction SRS clinical trial with 19 GBM patients. Each data entry consists of pre-operative Bas-mpMRIs, survival days and patient ages. Basic clinical characteristics are also available for SRS clinical trial data. The multi-institutional public dataset was used for workflow establishing (90% of data) and initial validation (10% of data). The validated workflow was then evaluated on the institutional clinical trial data.
resultsOur proposed OS prediction workflow achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 on the public dataset and 0.72 on the institutional clinical trial dataset to classify patients into 2 OS classes as long-survivors (>12 months) and short-survivors (<12 months), despite the large variation in Bas-mpMRI protocols. In addition, as part of the intermediate results, the proposed workflow can also provide detailed GBM sub-regions auto-segmentation with a whole tumor Dice score of 0.91.
conclusionOur study demonstrates the feasibility of employing this DL-based end-to-end workflow to predict the OS of patients with GBM using only the pre-resection Bas-mpMRIs. This DL-based workflow can be potentially applied to assist timely clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.