Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637342›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Development and Validation of Dynamic 5-Year Breast Cancer Risk Model Using Repeated Mammograms.

Shu Jiang, Debbie L Bennett, Bernard A Rosner, Rulla M Tamimi, Graham A Colditz

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shu JiangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-4838
Debbie L BennettDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-1898-0361
Bernard A RosnerChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Rulla M TamimiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-0291

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent image-based long-term risk prediction models do not fully use previous screening mammogram images. Dynamic prediction models have not been investigated for use in routine care.

methodsWe analyzed a prospective WashU clinic-based cohort of 10,099 cancer-free women at entry (between November 3, 2008 and February 2012). Follow-up through 2020 identified 478 pathology-confirmed breast cancers (BCs). The cohort included 27% Black women. An external validation cohort (Emory) included 18,360 women screened from 2013, followed through 2020. This included 42% Black women and 332 pathology-confirmed BC excluding those diagnosed within 6 months of screening. We trained a dynamic model using repeated screening mammograms at WashU to predict 5-year risk. This opportunistic screening service presented a range of mammogram images for each woman. We applied the model to the external validation data to evaluate discrimination performance (AUC) and calibrated to US SEER.

resultsUsing 3 years of previous mammogram images available at the current screening visit, we obtained a 5-year AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.83) in the external validation. This represents a significant improvement over the current visit mammogram AUC 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.77;

conclusionAdding previous screening mammogram images improves 5-year BC risk prediction beyond static models. It can identify women at high risk who might benefit from supplemental screening or risk-reduction strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39637342
PMCPMC11634085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.