Observational studyBlood advances2025
Trial eligibility, treatment patterns, and outcome for venetoclax-based therapy in AML: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03987958 (Prospective Non-interventional Study to Describe the Effectiveness and Safety of Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Non-interventional Study to Describe the Effectiveness and Safety of Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients in Routine Clinical Practice (REVIVE Study)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- CPX-351 selectively benefits patients with AML and myelodysplasia-related mutations in the pivotal randomized trial.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Article
- Outcomes of patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukaemia treated with front-line hypomethylating agents and venetoclax: A retrospective Italian study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Intensive induction therapy with FLAG-idarubicinvenetoclax for fit older high-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Review
- Integrating Targeted Therapies into AML Frontline Therapy: Who Gets What and What Does the Future Hold?Cancers · 2026Review
- Real-world outcomes of venetoclax and azacitidine in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (VENUS study).International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Does the Timing of Response Impact the Outcome of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents? A Proof of Concept from a Monocentric Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sharpening the Tools to Get the Edge on Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractVenetoclax plus hypomethylating agents are considered standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) judged ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC). Real-world studies complement clinical trials, because patterns of patient selection, treatment exposure, and postremission management may vary. This prospective observational multicenter study included 209 newly diagnosed IC-ineligible patients with a median age 75 years (interquartile range, 71-81 years). A high proportion of patients had secondary AML (53.7%), adverse-risk disease (35.3%), and complex karyotype (15.5%). At a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 0.1-43), median overall survival (mOS) was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9,15.4). Composite complete remission was achieved in 65.2% (CR, 44.4%; CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, 20.8%). Of responding patients, 21.1% underwent stem cell transplantation. When stratified based on VIALE-A original eligibility criteria, mOS was 17.8 months for patients meeting eligibility criteria and 10.7 months for patients who did not (P = .027). AML ontogeny (P = .024), reduced kidney function (P = .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; P = .0017), European LeukemiaNET (ELN) risk (P = .01), and body mass index (P = .0298) were significantly associated with OS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis confirmed independent association of OS with AML ontogeny (P = .012), CCI (P = .033), and ELN risk (P = .019). Patients enrolled in the latter half of the study period demonstrated improved OS than those enrolled earlier (P = .026). This prospective observational study highlights outcomes of patient subgroups, including those excluded from registration trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03987958.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.