ReviewJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024
When Things Go Wrong: A Guide to the Medical, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Surgical Complications.
Review in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Litigation meets evidence: a novel approach to understanding preventable complications in breast reconstruction.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Routine 6-Week Outpatient Visit in Patients After Osteosynthesis of Lower Extremity Fractures: Is It Truly Necessary?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing AI implementation for surgery: recommendations for infrastructure and deployment in the operating room.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The Predictive Value of Clinical and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Emergency Colic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Health literacy of patients hospitalized for digestive surgeries.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- How Surgeons and Surgical Leaders Manage Complications, Medical Errors, Malpractice, and Second Victim Syndrome.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical complications remain an unfortunate inevitability of surgical practice. When adverse events arise, orthopaedic surgeons must be prepared to navigate the complex medical, ethical, and legal dimensions through a multifaceted response. Prompt communication and collaboration with the risk management team, along with proper documentation, are essential. The art of disclosure must be guided by compassionate yet candid discussions that focus on transparency and accountability. The effects of complications transcend the confines of the operating room, affecting not only patients and their families but also orthopaedic surgeons. Without adequate support, the emotional consequences experienced by surgeons involved in the adverse event can lead to devastating cascading effects, which negatively affect job performance and patient care due to maladaptive coping mechanisms. To ameliorate these issues, programs have been developed to improve the psychological and personal well-being of healthcare providers after adverse events, shifting toward a nonpunitive culture that emphasizes improvement rather than blame. In light of the absence of a roadmap for orthopaedic surgeons facing complications, this review is dedicated to presenting a comprehensive guide for navigating such events when they arise, while also highlighting the effect of these challenges on surgeons and potential avenues for their support and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.