Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637197›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Do errors in the GHQ-12 response options matter?

Bethany Croak, Rupa Bhundia, Danielle Lamb, Neil Greenberg, Sharon A M Stevelink, Nora Trompeter, Simon Wessely, G James Rubin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bethany CroakDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6486-8154
Rupa BhundiaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Danielle LambDepartment of Applied Health Research, NIHR ARC North Thames, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Neil GreenbergDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-2971
Sharon A M StevelinkDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nora TrompeterDepartment of Applied Health Research, NIHR ARC North Thames, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon WesselyDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
G James RubinDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used measure of psychological wellbeing. Because there are seven different sets of response options across the twelve items, there is scope for transcription errors to occur when researchers assemble their study materials. The impact of such errors might be more important if they occur in the first set of response options than if they occur later in the questionnaire, once participants have become aware that options to the right of the GHQ-12 response sets always indicate worse wellbeing.

aimsTo test the impact of introducing errors into the first and eighth set of response options for the GHQ-12 that render those response sets partially illogical.

methodsWe used a double-blind randomised controlled trial, pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/syhwf). Participants were recruited by a market research company from their existing panel of respondents in Great Britain. Participants were randomly allocated to receive one of three versions of the GHQ-12: a correct version (n = 500), a version with a mistake in the first item (n = 502), or a mistake in the eighth item (n = 502). Mistakes replaced 'better than usual' (item one) or 'more so than usual' (item eight) with 'not at all.'

resultsWe found no differences between the versions in terms of number of participants with possible poor psychological wellbeing (χ2 = 0.32, df = 2, p = 0.85) or in mean GHQ-12 scores for the three groups (F(2, 1501) = 0.26, p = 0.77).

conclusionsSmall deviations from the standard GHQ-12 wording do not have a substantive impact on results.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39637197
PMCPMC11620626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.