ArticlePloS one2024
Utility of quantitative whole-body autoradiography (QWBA) and oxidative combustion (OC) analysis in the assessment of tissue distribution of [14C]Mefuparib (CVL218) in SD and LE rats.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn tissue distribution studies of radiopharmaceuticals, quantitative whole-body autoradiography (QWBA) and oxidative combustion (OC) analysis are the two important methods that have not been compared using the same drug. Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Long-Evans (LE) rats, both of which are commonly used rodents in tissue distribution studies, have also not been compared using the same drug. Comparative studies are important for aiding the selection of appropriate experimental methods and animals.
methodsTo evaluate the tissue distribution of [14C]Mefuparib (CVL218) in rats and assess its clinical safety, QWBA and OC analysis were used. The differences between the two methods were noted. Comparisons between the tissue distribution results of LE and SD rats were also done.
resultsThe QWBA and OC distribution analysis showed that [14C]CVL218-related radioactivity could be distributed in 19 tissues. For 89.47% of the tissues, no significant differences were noted between the two methods. There were also no differences in the pharmacokinetics data for plasma and brain homogenates between LE and SD rats. However, the pharmacokinetics data for liver and kidney homogenates were seven-fold higher in LE rats than in SD ones.
conclusionsBoth the OC and QWBA methods revealed that [14C]CVL218 could be widely distributed in the tissues of rats. The OC had a lower limit of quantification while QWBA provided a more comprehensive analysis of [14C]CVL218 distribution. More safety was associated with using LE rat data to estimate the dosimetry of [14C]CVL218 for the whole-body, for human radiolabeled mass balance studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.