Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637186›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor cortex increase endurance running performance? a randomized crossover-controlled trial.

Géraldine Martens, Stéphanie Hody, Stephen Bornheim, Luca Angius, Louis De Beaumont, Felipe Fregni, Giulio Ruffini, Jean-François Kaux, Aurore Thibaut, Thierry Bury

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04005846 (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04005846 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Improve Maximal Aerobic Performance in Recreational and Trained Runners

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LiegeRan2019 to 2023Enrolled53ConditionsAthletic PerformanceArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Géraldine MartensDepartment of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7038-7165
Stéphanie HodyDepartment of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1951-3725
Stephen BornheimDepartment of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Luca AngiusFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4606-4272
Louis De BeaumontSport & Trauma Applied Research Lab, Montreal Sacred Heart Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation, Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Giulio RuffiniNeuroelectrics Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jean-François KauxDepartment of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Aurore ThibautComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University and University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Thierry BuryDepartment of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has been shown to increase exercise performance in strength and cycling studies but its effects on running endurance remain unclear. The objectives of this randomized sham-controlled crossover trial were to assess tDCS efficacy on submaximal treadmill running time to exhaustion (TTE). Forty-five healthy male runners aged between 18 and 32 years (mean maximal oxygen consumption: 46.6 mL/min/kg) performed two constant-load tests at 90% of their maximal aerobic speed preceded by 20 minutes of active or sham multichannel (5 anodes, 3 cathodes) tDCS applied over the bilateral motor cortex with a total intensity of 4 mA. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate, VO2, and heart rate were monitored every five minutes until volitional exhaustion. The median [IQR] TTE was similar following active (12.2 [10.5, 16.1] minutes) or sham (12.5 [10.2, 15.1] minutes) tDCS (p = 0.96). Likewise, there were no significant differences between active and sham conditions for RPE, blood lactate, final VO2, and final heart rate (all p ≥0.05). No difference in TTE was found when stratifying groups according to their VO2max (i.e., VO2max ≥ 45 mL/min/Kg, p = 0.53; VO2max < 45 mL/min/Kg, p = 0.45) but there was a trend for a significant correlation between VO2max and change in TTE (p = 0.06). TDCS applied over the bilateral motor cortex did not improve endurance performance in a large sample of trained runners. Characterization of individual tDCS responsiveness deserves further consideration. In our experimental conditions, tDCS had no ergogenic effect on endurance running performance. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration: NCT04005846.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesHeart RateMotor CortexOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EnduranceRunningTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultAthletic PerformanceHumansLactic AcidMaleYoung AdultLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID39637186
PMCPMC11620604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.