ArticlePloS one2024
Breathing signatures of semantic and phonemic verbal fluency and their impact on test performance in a sample of young Norwegian adults.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Verbal fluency (VF) represents an important aspect of intelligence, in which oral word generation is demanded following semantic or phonemic cues. Two reliable phenomena of VF execution have been reported: A decay in performance across 1-minute trial and a discrepancy score between the semantic and phonemic VF tests (VFTs). Although, these characteristics have been explained from various cognitive standpoints, the fundamental role of speech breathing has not yet been considered. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the role of respiratory function for word generation in VFTs in healthy individuals. Thirty healthy young adults performed VFTs during definite periods of 1 minute while wearing a pneumotachograph mask. Duration, peak and volume of airflow were acquired during inspirations and expirations. Also, respiratory rate and acoustic data of verbal responses were registered, and accuracy scores were calculated. Each 1-minute trial was divided into four intervals of 15-seconds where parameters were calculated. Repeated measures ANOVAs and repeated measures correlations were used in the statistical analyses. Data revealed that respiratory function was significantly coupled to VF performance mostly during inhalations. Small but constant increments of inhale airflow occurred in phonemic VFT as well as higher peak airflow in both tasks, being higher for semantic VFT. High respiratory rate characterized performance of both VFTs across intervals. Airflow adjustments corresponded to better VF accuracy, while increments in respiratory rate did not. The present study shows a complex interplay of breathing needs during VF performance that varies along the performance period and that notably connects to inspirations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.