Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637043›Full record

ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2025

Performance of the AmpliSeq NGS panel in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

Wiame Potonnier, Erell Guillerm, Claude Bigorgne, Cécile Ghander, Malanie Roy, Florence Coulet, François Ansart, Fabrice Menegaux, Laurence Leenhardt, Isabelle Brocheriou and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wiame PotonnierAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0009-7247-0267
Erell GuillermAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Génétique, Unité fonctionnelle d'Oncogénétique et Angiogénétique Moléculaire, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Claude BigorgneAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Cécile GhanderAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service des Pathologies Thyroïdiennes et Tumorales Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Malanie RoyAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service des Pathologies Thyroïdiennes et Tumorales Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Florence CouletAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Génétique, Unité fonctionnelle d'Oncogénétique et Angiogénétique Moléculaire, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
François AnsartAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service des Pathologies Thyroïdiennes et Tumorales Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Fabrice MenegauxAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Chirurgie Générale, Viscérale et Endocrinienne, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Laurence LeenhardtAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service des Pathologies Thyroïdiennes et Tumorales Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Isabelle BrocheriouAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Gabrielle DeniziautAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, Paris, France.
Camille BuffetAPHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service des Pathologies Thyroïdiennes et Tumorales Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 16 Tumeurs Thyroïdiennes, CNRS UMR 7371, INSERM U1146, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytological analysis fails to confirm the benignity or malignancy of Bethesda III, IV and V thyroid nodules. Molecular tests performed on FNA samples have demonstrated interesting results in improving the diagnosis of these nodules. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III, IV and V). Methods: Retrospective, monocentric study including 121 patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III, IV and V) who underwent a routine FNA procedure for molecular testing using the AmpliSeq general cancer NGS panel, with an available final histological diagnosis. The main objective was to estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of malignancy of the AmpliSeq panel in Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules. Performance assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV) was carried out in the grouped categories III and IV, in the overall cohort and in each Bethesda category. The final histological diagnosis was used as the designated gold standard. Results: Histologically, 86 nodules were benign and 35 nodules were malignant. Molecular analysis yielded a positive result in 40 nodules. Panel performances assessed in the grouped categories Bethesda III and IV demonstrated a 55.0% (95% CI: 31.5; 76.9) sensitivity, a 76.9% (95% CI: 66.0; 85.7) specificity, a 37.9% (95% CI: 25.7; 51.9) PPV and an 87.0% (95% CI: 80.2; 91.7) NPV, considering a 20% prevalence of malignancy. Conclusions: The performances of the AmpliSeq panel are promising; however, the NPV is not sufficient to avoid diagnostic surgery in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Significance statement: Different ancillary molecular tests have been marketed in the USA and are integrated into the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Unfortunately, none of these molecular tests are currently available in France and clinicians lack effective tools for the management of these nodules. The aim of this work was to assess the performance of a large general-cancer targeted NGS panel in a series of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (i.e. Bethesda III and IV categories and, to some extent, the Bethesda V category), managed in a French university medical center referral for thyroid tumors.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleAdultAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificityfine-needle aspirationindeterminate cytologynext-generation sequencingthyroid nodulethyroid tumors

Identifiers

PMID39637043
PMCPMC11816033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.