Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637032›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Classifying forensically important flies using deep learning to support pathologists and rescue teams during forensic investigations.

Anna Katharina Gohe, Marius Johann Kottek, Ricardo Buettner, Pascal Penava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Katharina GoheChair of Hybrid Intelligence, Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armes Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Marius Johann KottekChair of Hybrid Intelligence, Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armes Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Ricardo BuettnerChair of Hybrid Intelligence, Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armes Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2263-6408
Pascal PenavaChair of Hybrid Intelligence, Helmut-Schmidt-University / University of the Federal Armes Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic entomology can help estimate the postmortem interval in criminal investigations. In particular, forensically important fly species that can be found on a body and in its environment at various times after death provide valuable information. However, the current method for identifying fly species is labor intensive, expensive, and may become more serious in view of a shortage of specialists. In this paper, we propose the use of computer vision and deep learning to classify adult flies according to three different families, Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, Rhiniidae, and their corresponding genera Chrysomya, Lucilia, Sarcophaga, Rhiniinae, and Stomorhina, which can lead to efficient and accurate estimation of time of death, for example, with the use of camera-equipped drones. The development of such a deep learning model for adult flies may be particularly useful in crisis situations, such as natural disasters and wars, when people disappear. In these cases drones can be used for searching large areas. In this study, two models were evaluated using transfer learning with MobileNetV3-Large and VGG19. Both models achieved a very high accuracy of 99.39% and 99.79%. In terms of inference time, the MobileNetV3-Large model was faster with an average time per step of 1.036 seconds than the VGG19 model, which took 2.066 seconds per step. Overall, the results highlight the potential of deep learning models for the classification of fly species in forensic entomology and search and rescue operations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDipteraForensic EntomologyAnimalsCalliphoridaeHumans

Identifiers

PMID39637032
PMCPMC11620585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.