ArticlePloS one2024
An automated approach to identify sarcasm in low-resource language.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paraphrase detection for Urdu language text using fine-tune BiLSTM framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcasm detection has emerged due to its applicability in natural language processing (NLP) but lacks substantial exploration in low-resource languages like Urdu, Arabic, Pashto, and Roman-Urdu. While fewer studies identifying sarcasm have focused on low-resource languages, most of the work is in English. This research addresses the gap by exploring the efficacy of diverse machine learning (ML) algorithms in identifying sarcasm in Urdu. The scarcity of annotated datasets for low-resource language becomes a challenge. To overcome the challenge, we curated and released a comparatively large dataset named Urdu Sarcastic Tweets (UST) Dataset, comprising user-generated comments from [Formula: see text] (former Twitter). Automatic sarcasm detection in text involves using computational methods to determine if a given statement is intended to be sarcastic. However, this task is challenging due to the influence of the user's behavior and attitude and their expression of emotions. To address this challenge, we employ various baseline ML classifiers to evaluate their effectiveness in detecting sarcasm in low-resource languages. The primary models evaluated in this study are support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier (K-NN), linear regression (LR), random forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), and XGBoost. Our study's assessment involved validating the performance of these ML classifiers on two distinct datasets-the Tanz-Indicator and the UST dataset. The SVM classifier consistently outperformed other ML models with an accuracy of 0.85 across various experimental setups. This research underscores the importance of tailored sarcasm detection approaches to accommodate specific linguistic characteristics in low-resource languages, paving the way for future investigations. By providing open access to the UST dataset, we encourage its use as a benchmark for sarcasm detection research in similar linguistic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.