ArticlePloS one2024
Exploiting the features of deep residual network with SVM classifier for human posture recognition.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Feasibility of Fall Detection Using Bluetooth Low Energy Channel Sounding in Residential Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning AI model for determining the relationship between X-Ray detectors and patient positioning in chest radiography.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, there have been a lot of advances in the area of human posture recognition. Among multiple approaches proposed to solve this problem, those based on deep learning have shown promising results. Taking another step in this direction, this paper analyzes the performance of deep learning-based hybrid architecture for fall detection, In this regard, the fusion of the residual network (ResNet-50) deep features with support vector machine (SVM) at the classification layer has been considered. The proposed approach outperforms the existing methods yielding an accuracy of 98.82%, 97.95%, and 99.98% on three datasets i.e. Multi-Camera Fall (MCF) using four postures, UR Fall detection (URFD) using four postures, and UP-Fall detection (UPFD) using four postures respectively. It is important to mention that the existing methods achieve accuracies of 97.9%, 97.33%, and 95.64% on the MCF, URDF and UPFD datasets, respectively. Moreover, we achieved 100% accuracy on the UPFD two-posture task. The URFD and MCF datasets have been utilized to assess the fall detection performance of our method under a realistic environment (e.g. camouflage, occlusion, and variation in lighting conditions due to day/night lighting variation). For comparison purposes, we have also performed experiments using six state-of-the-art deep learning networks, namely; ResNet-50, ResNet-101, VGG-19, InceptionV3, MobileNet, and Xception. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms other network models both in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. We also compared the performance of SVM with Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, KNN, AdaBoost, and MLP used at the classifier layer and found that SVM outperforms or is on par with other classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.